Olsen et al. (2001): The effect of aloe vera gel/mild soap versus mild soap alone in preventing skin reactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Reference=Publication: The effect of aloe vera gel/mild soap versus mild soap alone in preventing skin reactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy | |Reference=Publication: The effect of aloe vera gel/mild soap versus mild soap alone in preventing skin reactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Brief summary= | =Brief summary= | ||
In this study, researchers investigated the effect of an aloe vera gel (100%) on skin reactions in patients undergoing radiotherapy. During radiotherapy patients were given a mild, unscented soap, with which to cleanse their skin. About half of the patients also received the aloe gel, which they applied directly to their radiated skin every day after radiotherapy. The researchers found, that patients of the aloe arm tended to have less erythema, but only when the radiation dose was above 2,700. Patients of the aloe arm also took longer for their skin to react to the radiation, but again only when the radiation dose was above 2,700. | In this study, researchers investigated the effect of an aloe vera gel (100%) on skin reactions in patients undergoing radiotherapy. During radiotherapy patients were given a mild, unscented soap, with which to cleanse their skin. About half of the patients also received the aloe gel, which they applied directly to their radiated skin every day after radiotherapy. The researchers found, that patients of the aloe arm tended to have less erythema, but only when the radiation dose was above 2,700. Patients of the aloe arm also took longer for their skin to react to the radiation, but again only when the radiation dose was above 2,700. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Study Design (RCT) | {{Study Design (RCT) | ||
|Perspective=Prospective | |Perspective=Prospective | ||
|Centralized= | |Centralized=Monocentric | ||
|Blinding=Double | |Blinding=Double | ||
|Is randomized=Yes | |Is randomized=Yes | ||
|Cross-over=No | |Cross-over=No | ||
|Number of arms= | |Number of arms=2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Study characteristics= | =Study characteristics= | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|Exclusion criteria=Radiotherapy of the brain or for gynaecological cancers | |Exclusion criteria=Radiotherapy of the brain or for gynaecological cancers | ||
|N randomized=73 | |N randomized=73 | ||
|Analysis= | |Analysis=PP Analysis | ||
|Specifications on analyses= | |Specifications on analyses=Data of 70 patients were availible. | ||
|Countries of data collection=United States | |Countries of data collection=United States | ||
|LoE=2b Oxford 2009 | |LoE=2b Oxford 2009 | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
|Arm type=Intervention | |Arm type=Intervention | ||
|Number of participants (arm)=32 | |Number of participants (arm)=32 | ||
|Drop-out= | |Drop-out=Not arm specified: 3 | ||
|Drop-out reasons= | |Drop-out reasons=1 = did not receive insurance authorization | ||
1 = decision to delay radiotherapy until chemotherapy administration was completed | |||
1 = refused radiation therapy | |||
|Intervention=Aloe vera | |Intervention=Aloe vera | ||
|Dosage and regime=Apply the 100% aloe vera gel to the irradiated skin up 6 to 8 times a day after radiotherapy from the start of radiotherapy until the end of therpy | |Dosage and regime=Apply the 100% aloe vera gel to the irradiated skin up 6 to 8 times a day after radiotherapy from the start of radiotherapy until the end of therpy | ||
Line 82: | Line 86: | ||
|Side Effects / Interactions=Not reported, although no allergic skin reactions to aloe have been documented. | |Side Effects / Interactions=Not reported, although no allergic skin reactions to aloe have been documented. | ||
|Order number=1 | |Order number=1 | ||
|Arm topic=Aloe vera | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Arm | {{Arm | ||
|Arm type=Passive control | |Arm type=Passive control | ||
|Number of participants (arm)=38 | |Number of participants (arm)=38 | ||
|Drop-out= | |Drop-out=Not arm specified: 3 | ||
|Drop-out reasons= | |Drop-out reasons=1 = did not receive insurance authorization | ||
1 = decision to delay radiotherapy until chemotherapy administration was completed | |||
1 = refused radiation therapy | |||
|Intervention=No additional intervention | |Intervention=No additional intervention | ||
|Dosage and regime=+ all patients: advised to gently clean the irradiated skin with mild, unscented soap and dry it with a soft, clean towel, protect the skin from injury, avoid prolonged exposure to sunlight and wear loose-fitting clothing. | |Dosage and regime=+ all patients: advised to gently clean the irradiated skin with mild, unscented soap and dry it with a soft, clean towel, protect the skin from injury, avoid prolonged exposure to sunlight and wear loose-fitting clothing. | ||
Line 94: | Line 103: | ||
|Side Effects / Interactions=NA | |Side Effects / Interactions=NA | ||
|Order number=2 | |Order number=2 | ||
|Arm topic=Aloe vera | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Arm Overview}} | {{Arm Overview}} | ||
Line 131: | Line 141: | ||
|Overall RoB judgment=? | |Overall RoB judgment=? | ||
|Order number=1 | |Order number=1 | ||
|Outcome topic=Aloe vera | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Outcome Overview}} | {{Outcome Overview}} |
Latest revision as of 14:20, 29 November 2024
Reference ↗ | |
---|---|
Title | The effect of aloe vera gel/mild soap versus mild soap alone in preventing skin reactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy |
Topic | Aloe vera |
Author | Olsen, DL, Raub, W Jr, Bradley, C, Johnson, M, Macias, JL, Love, V, Markoe, A |
Year | 2001 |
Journal | Oncology Nursing Forum |
DOI | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11338761/ |
Brief summary
In this study, researchers investigated the effect of an aloe vera gel (100%) on skin reactions in patients undergoing radiotherapy. During radiotherapy patients were given a mild, unscented soap, with which to cleanse their skin. About half of the patients also received the aloe gel, which they applied directly to their radiated skin every day after radiotherapy. The researchers found, that patients of the aloe arm tended to have less erythema, but only when the radiation dose was above 2,700. Patients of the aloe arm also took longer for their skin to react to the radiation, but again only when the radiation dose was above 2,700.
In dieser Studie untersuchten Forscher die Wirkung eines Aloe Vera Gels (100%) auf Hautreaktionen bei Patienten, die eine Strahlentherapie erhalten sollen. Während der Strahlentherapie erhielten die Patienten eine milde, unparfümierte Seife, mit der sie ihre Haut reinigen konnten. Etwa die Hälfte der Patienten erhielt zusätzlich das Aloe-Gel, das sie jeden Tag nach der Bestrahlung direkt auf ihre bestrahlte Haut auftrugen. Die Forscher fanden, dass Patienten, die das Aloe-Gel verwendeten, tendenziell seltener Erytheme hatten, aber nur, wenn die Strahlendosis über 2.700 lag. Bei Patienten, die das Aloe-Gel verwenden, dauerte es auch länger, bis ihre Haut auf die Strahlung reagierte, aber wieder nur, wenn die Strahlendosis über 2.700 lag.
Study Design
Prospective / Retrospective Prospective: forward-looking, examples include clinical trials, cohort studies, and long-term observational studies;</br>Retrospective: backward-looking, relying on existing data, examples include case-control studies and retrospective cohort studies | Prospective |
---|---|
Monocentric / Multicentric Monocentric: conducted in one center/ hospital; </br>Multicentric: conducted in multiple centers/ hospitals | Monocentric |
Blinding No: Open, all parties are aware of group assignments;</br>Single: one party is unaware of group assignments (generally participants);</br>Double: two parties are unaware of group assignments (generally the participants and the researchers); </br>Triple: concealing group assignment from additional parties | Double |
Is randomized | Yes |
Cross-over Participants alternate between different treatment groups or conditions over a specified period, allowing each participant to serve as their own control | No |
Number of arms | 2 |
Study characteristics
Inclusion criteria | Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy |
---|---|
Exclusion criteria | Radiotherapy of the brain or for gynaecological cancers |
N randomized | 73 |
Analysis PP: Per Protocol analysis, i.e. only participants included who adhered to the study protocol.</br>ITT: Intention-to-treat analysis, i.e. all randomized participants included regardless of any drop-outs or changes in assignment.</br>mITT: modified Intention-to-treat analysis can refer to analyses in which participants with missing outcome data are excluded or it can refer to analyses in which only participants who received at least one treatment dose are included. In this case, participants dropped out of the study prematurely for reasons unrelated to the treatment. | PP Analysis |
Specifications on analyses | Data of 70 patients were availible. |
Countries of data collection | United States |
LoE Level of evidence | 2b Oxford 2009 |
Outcome timeline Data collection times | T0: Baseline proir to first radiation
T1: weekly until the end of radiation |
Characteristics of participants
Setting Refers to cancer therapy setting.</br>- Curative therapy: aims to completely eradicate a disease and achieve a full recovery; </br>- Neo-adjuvant therapy: form of curative therapy, given before the primary treatment for cancer (usually surgery); </br>- Adjuvant therapy: form of curative therapy, given after the primary treatment for cancer (usually surgery); </br>- Palliative therapy: focuses on providing relief from symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients, without necessarily targeting the underlying disease; </br>- Active surveillance: involves close monitoring of disease progression without any intervention (typically used for prostate cancer);</br>- No therapy setting: Patients who completed therapy/are currently not in cancer treatment, cancer survivors. | Curative |
---|---|
Types of cancer "Other Cancers" means that only a subpopulation was specified, but further unspecified cancer types were included | Head and Neck Cancers, Breast Cancer, Gastrointestinal Cancers, Prostate Cancer |
Cancer stages Early Stage: generally refers to cancer that is localized to the area where it started, mostly stages I and II;</br>Advanced Stage: cancer that has spread beyond its original site, mostly stages III and IV, with stage IV indicating distant metastasis | NI |
Specifications on cancer stages | Tumor site:
Head/neck: Aloe arm = 39%; Control arm = 43% Chest: Aloe arm = 58%; Control arm = 52% Abdomen/pelvis: Aloe arm = 0%; Control arm = 3% Extremities: Aloe arm = 3%; Control arm = 2% |
Comorbidities | NI |
Current cancer therapies | Radiation therapy |
Specifications on cancer therapies | Chemotherapy:
Aloe arm: Yes = 28%, No = 72% Control arm: Yes = 26%, No = 74%
|
Previous cancer therapies | Chemotherapy |
Gender | Mixed |
Gender specifications | Gender of the participants: female = 48 (66%); male = 25 (34%) |
Age groups | Adults (18+) |
Age groups specification | Mean age of the participants = 56 years (Range: 18-84)
Aloe arm: <45 years = 18%; 45-59 years = 55%; >60 years = 27% Control arm: <45 years = 18%; 45-59 years = 32%; >60 years = 50% |
Arms
Arm type Active control: group receives active treatment; </br>Passive control: for example treatment as usual, waiting control, no treatment | Intervention |
---|---|
Number of participants (arm) N randomized | 32 |
Drop-out Number of participants who left the study for any reason or did not provide information on every data collection date | Not arm specified: 3 |
Drop-out reasons | 1 = did not receive insurance authorization
1 = decision to delay radiotherapy until chemotherapy administration was completed 1 = refused radiation therapy |
Intervention | Aloe vera |
Dosage and regime | Apply the 100% aloe vera gel to the irradiated skin up 6 to 8 times a day after radiotherapy from the start of radiotherapy until the end of therpy
|
One-time application | No |
Duration in days For long-term interventions, the number of days is an estimation.</br>A value of -999 indicates that the exact duration cannot be extracted from the study due to ambiguous or incomplete information. See Outcome timeline or Dosage and regime for further information. | 56 |
Side effects / Interactions | Not reported, although no allergic skin reactions to aloe have been documented. |
Arm type Active control: group receives active treatment; </br>Passive control: for example treatment as usual, waiting control, no treatment | Passive control |
---|---|
Number of participants (arm) N randomized | 38 |
Drop-out Number of participants who left the study for any reason or did not provide information on every data collection date | Not arm specified: 3 |
Drop-out reasons | 1 = did not receive insurance authorization
1 = decision to delay radiotherapy until chemotherapy administration was completed 1 = refused radiation therapy |
Intervention | No additional intervention |
Dosage and regime | + all patients: advised to gently clean the irradiated skin with mild, unscented soap and dry it with a soft, clean towel, protect the skin from injury, avoid prolonged exposure to sunlight and wear loose-fitting clothing. |
One-time application | No |
Duration in days For long-term interventions, the number of days is an estimation.</br>A value of -999 indicates that the exact duration cannot be extracted from the study due to ambiguous or incomplete information. See Outcome timeline or Dosage and regime for further information. | 56 |
Side effects / Interactions | NA |
Outcomes
Toxicity
Outcome type As specificed by the authors | Primary |
---|---|
Outcome specification | Nurses and physicians cunducted the skin weekly.
Morbidity score: 0 = No change 1 = Faint/dull erythema 2 = Bright erythema 3 = Moist desquamation 4 = Ulceration/necrosis |
Type of measurement | RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) |
Results during intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". | Erythema/itching/skin appearance/discolouration:
No differences between the arms. Time to skin changes due to cumulative radiation dose: ≤2,700cGy: No differences between the arms. >2,700cGy: Significantly longer time in the Aloe arm (median 5 weeks) until the appearance of skin changes compared to control arm (median 3 weeks), p=0.013. |
Results after intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". | NA |
Risk of Bias Assessment: Cochrane RoB tool 2.0 | |
---|---|
Bias arising from the randomization process | ? |
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (assignment to intervention) | ? |
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (adhering to intervention) | NA |
Bias due to missing outcome data | ? |
Bias in measurement of the outcome | ? |
Bias in selection of the reported result | ? |
Other sources of bias | ? |
Overall RoB judgment | ? |
Funding and Conflicts of Interest
Funding | NI |
---|---|
Conflicts of Interest | NI |
Further points for assessing the study
Sample
Power analysis performed | ? |
---|---|
- Sample size corresponds to power analysis | ? |
- Reasons for insufficient sample size based on power analysis | ? |
If no power analysis performed: at least moderate sample size (n >= 30 per arm) | ? |
Ethnicity mentioned | ? |
Alternative Explanation
Other explanations for an effect besides the investigated intervention | ? |
---|---|
- Possibility of attention effects | ? |
- Possibility of placebo effects | ? |
- Other reasons | ? |
Statistics
Correct use of parametric and non-parametric tests Testing for normal distribution only necessary if parametric tests are used, NI: use of parametric tests without report of normal distribution testing | ? |
---|---|
Correction for multiple testing | ? |
Measurement of compliance | ? |
Consistent reporting in numbers (figures, flowchart, abstract, results) | ? |
Comprehensive and coherent reporting | ? |
Cross-over | ? |
- Sufficient washout period | ? |
- Tested for carry-over effects | ? |
- Tested for sequence effects | ? |
Interpretation of results
Effect sizes reported (clinical vs. statistical significance) | ? |
---|---|
Side effects systematically recorded | ? |
Side effects considered in result interpretation | ? |
Ethics votum | ? |
Additional Notes
PRO/CONTRA