Jump to content

Campos et al. (2011): Guarana (Paullinia cupana) Improves Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Systemic Chemotherapy: Difference between revisions

From CAMIH
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 78: Line 78:
Dermatologic: Guarana: n = 1, placebo: n = 3
Dermatologic: Guarana: n = 1, placebo: n = 3
|Order number=1
|Order number=1
|Arm topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Arm
{{Arm
Line 107: Line 108:
Total Guarana n=30, Placebo n=45, no statistical comparison conducted
Total Guarana n=30, Placebo n=45, no statistical comparison conducted
|Order number=2
|Order number=2
|Arm topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Arm Overview}}
{{Arm Overview}}
Line 139: Line 141:
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Order number=1
|Order number=1
|Outcome topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Outcome
{{Outcome
Line 165: Line 168:
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Order number=2
|Order number=2
|Outcome topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Outcome
{{Outcome
Line 187: Line 191:
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Order number=3
|Order number=3
|Outcome topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Outcome
{{Outcome
Line 204: Line 209:
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Overall RoB judgment=?
|Order number=4
|Order number=4
|Outcome topic=Guarana
}}
}}
{{Outcome Overview}}
{{Outcome Overview}}
Line 227: Line 233:
|Correction for multiple testing=?
|Correction for multiple testing=?
|Measurement of compliance=?
|Measurement of compliance=?
|Blinding reliable=?
|Check whether blinding was successful=?
|Consistent reporting in numbers=?
|Consistent reporting in numbers=?
|Comprehensive and coherent reporting=?
|Comprehensive and coherent reporting=?
Line 239: Line 243:
|Side effects taken into account in the interpretation of the results=?
|Side effects taken into account in the interpretation of the results=?
|Ethics / CoI / Funding=?
|Ethics / CoI / Funding=?
|Blinding reliable=?
|Check whether blinding was successful=?
|reasons given for samples being too small according to power analysis=?
|reasons given for samples being too small according to power analysis=?
|Testing for normal distribution=?
|Testing for normal distribution=?

Revision as of 14:34, 29 November 2024


Reference ↗
Title Guarana (Paullinia cupana) Improves Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Systemic Chemotherapy
Topic Guarana
Author Campos, M, Riechelmann, R, Martins, L, Hassan, B, Casa, F, Del Giglio, A
Year 2011
Journal The journal of alternative and complementary medicine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0571

Study Note

Brief summary

Fatigue is a common side effect of chemotherapy. In this study, researchers investigated the effect of guarana on chemotherapy-induced fatigue in patients with breast cancer. Researchers studied 75 women with increasing fatigue or who developed fatigue after chemotherapy. For 21 days, half of the women were asked to take guarana twice a day (every 12 hours), while the other half took a placebo. All patients then took nothing for a week and switched treatment for a further 21 days (i.e. those who took guarana then took the placebo and those who took the placebo then took the guarana). Fatigue improved significantly in women who took guarana, while fatigue worsened or did not change in those who took the placebo. Adverse events were present in both arms, ranging from insomnia and tachycardia to dermatologic reactions and nausea.

Müdigkeit ist ein häufiger Nebeneffekt der Chemotherapie. In dieser Studie untersuchten Forscher die Wirkung von Guarana auf eine Chemotherapie bedingte Fatigue bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs. Forscher untersuchten 75 Frauen mit zunehmender Fatigue oder die nach einer Chemotherapie eine Fatigue entwickelten. 21 Tage lang wurde die Hälfte der Frauen gebeten, Guarana zweimal täglich (jede 12 Stunden) einzunehmen, während die andere Hälfte ein Placebo einnahm. Alle Patientinnen nahmen dann eine Woche lang nichts und wechselten die Behandlung für weitere 21 Tage (d.h. diejenigen, die Guarana einnahmen, nahmen dann das Placebo ein und diejenigen, die das Placebo einnahmen, nahmen dann den Guarana ein). Bei Frauen, die Guarana einnahmen, verbesserte sich die Fatigue signifikant, während die Fatigue bei denjenigen, die das Placebo einnahmen, schlechter wurde oder sich nicht veränderte. Unerwünschte Ereignisse waren in beiden Gruppen vorhanden, von Insomnien, Tachykardien bis zu dermatologischen Reaktionen und Übelkeit.

Study Design

Prospective / Retrospective Prospective: forward-looking, examples include clinical trials, cohort studies, and long-term observational studies;</br>Retrospective: backward-looking, relying on existing data, examples include case-control studies and retrospective cohort studies Prospective
Monocentric / Multicentric Monocentric: conducted in one center/ hospital; </br>Multicentric: conducted in multiple centers/ hospitals Multicentric
Blinding No: Open, all parties are aware of group assignments;</br>Single: one party is unaware of group assignments (generally participants);</br>Double: two parties are unaware of group assignments (generally the participants and the researchers); </br>Triple: concealing group assignment from additional parties Double
Is randomized Yes
Cross-over Participants alternate between different treatment groups or conditions over a specified period, allowing each participant to serve as their own control Yes
Number of arms 2

Study characteristics

Inclusion criteria Adult woman (22-70 years) with Mamma-carcinoma
Exclusion criteria Hypothyroidism; depression or other severe psychiatric illness; anemia; previous antineoplastic treatment; contraindications to guarana (insomnia, angina or other cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, neurological disease); antidepressant, anxiolytic or sleep-inducing medications
N randomized 75
Analysis PP: Per Protocol analysis, i.e. only participants included who adhered to the study protocol.</br>ITT: Intention-to-treat analysis, i.e. all randomized participants included regardless of any drop-outs or changes in assignment.</br>mITT: modified Intention-to-treat analysis can refer to analyses in which participants with missing outcome data are excluded or it can refer to analyses in which only participants who received at least one treatment dose are included. In this case, participants dropped out of the study prematurely for reasons unrelated to the treatment. ITT Analysis, NI
Specifications on analyses 3 weeks of receiving placebo/intervention, 1 week washout, 3 weeks of receiving intervention/placebo

Consort diagram shows, that drop-out was excluded from final analysis, even though an ITT-analysis was mentioned in the method section

Countries of data collection Brazil
LoE Level of evidence 1b Oxford 2009
Outcome timeline Data collection times T0 = Baseline

T1 = Day 21 (after phase 1)

T2 = Day 49 (after phase 2)

Characteristics of participants

Setting Refers to cancer therapy setting.</br>- Curative therapy: aims to completely eradicate a disease and achieve a full recovery; </br>- Neo-adjuvant therapy: form of curative therapy, given before the primary treatment for cancer (usually surgery); </br>- Adjuvant therapy: form of curative therapy, given after the primary treatment for cancer (usually surgery); </br>- Palliative therapy: focuses on providing relief from symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients, without necessarily targeting the underlying disease; </br>- Active surveillance: involves close monitoring of disease progression without any intervention (typically used for prostate cancer);</br>- No therapy setting: Patients who completed therapy/are currently not in cancer treatment, cancer survivors. Curative
Types of cancer "Other Cancers" means that only a subpopulation was specified, but further unspecified cancer types were included Breast Cancer
Cancer stages Early Stage: generally refers to cancer that is localized to the area where it started, mostly stages I and II;</br>Advanced Stage: cancer that has spread beyond its original site, mostly stages III and IV, with stage IV indicating distant metastasis Early Stage, Advanced Stage
Specifications on cancer stages Involved patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer at any stage
Comorbidities NI
Current cancer therapies Chemotherapy
Specifications on cancer therapies NI
Previous cancer therapies NI
Gender Female
Gender specifications NA
Age groups Adults (18+)
Age groups specification Range: 22-70 years

Arms

Arm type Active control: group receives active treatment; </br>Passive control: for example treatment as usual, waiting control, no treatment Intervention, Placebo
Number of participants (arm) N randomized 43
Drop-out Number of participants who left the study for any reason or did not provide information on every data collection date Placebo-guarana arm: n=8

(first Placebo then guarana)

Drop-out reasons Discontinued placebo: n = 2,

- Rash: n = 1,

- Palpitations: n = 1

Excluded for forgetting to take more than 1 pill: n = 6


Note: Time of Drop-Outs unclear, since all patients are noted to start guarana but drop-out occured for placebo

Intervention Paullinia cupana, dried extract
Dosage and regime 2x/day, every 12 hours

(50 mg, Charge E16117007)

One-time application No
Duration in days For long-term interventions, the number of days is an estimation.</br>A value of -999 indicates that the exact duration cannot be extracted from the study due to ambiguous or incomplete information. See Outcome timeline or Dosage and regime for further information. 21
Side effects / Interactions Insomnia: Guarana: n = 22, placebo: n = 31,

Palpitation: Guarana: n = 10, placebo: n = 12, Nausea: Guarana: n = 25, placebo: n = 35, Anxiety: Guarana: n = 17, placebo: n = 25, Dermatologic: Guarana: n = 1, placebo: n = 3

Arm type Active control: group receives active treatment; </br>Passive control: for example treatment as usual, waiting control, no treatment Intervention, Placebo
Number of participants (arm) N randomized 32
Drop-out Number of participants who left the study for any reason or did not provide information on every data collection date Guarana-placebo arm: n = 7

(first guarana then placebo)

Drop-out reasons Discontinued guarana: n = 2

- Palpitations: n = 1

- Patient discontinued medication due to herpes zoster: n = 1

Excluded for forgetting to take more than 1 pill: n = 5


Note: Time of Drop-Outs unclear, since all patients are noted to start placebo but drop-out occured for guarana

Intervention Paullinia cupana, dried extract
Dosage and regime 2x/day, every 12 hours

(50 mg, Charge E16117007)

One-time application No
Duration in days For long-term interventions, the number of days is an estimation.</br>A value of -999 indicates that the exact duration cannot be extracted from the study due to ambiguous or incomplete information. See Outcome timeline or Dosage and regime for further information. 21
Side effects / Interactions Insomnia: Guarana: n = 22, placebo: n = 31,

Palpitation: Guarana: n = 10, placebo: n = 12, Nausea: Guarana: n = 25, placebo: n = 35, Anxiety: Guarana: n = 17, placebo: n = 25, Dermatologic: Guarana: n = 1, placebo: n = 3


Total Guarana n=30, Placebo n=45, no statistical comparison conducted

Outcomes

Fatigue

Outcome type As specificed by the authors Primary
Outcome specification Specific questionnaires were used:

FACIT-F that assesses self-reported QOL and fatigue with total score ranging from 0 to 160 FACIT-ES that includes a subspace evaluating menopausal symptoms, among other components that are totaled to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 180

Type of measurement FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy)
Results during intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". NA
Results after intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". FACIT-F: Significantly lower severity of fatigue with guarana compared to placebo,

Significantly more patients with improved FACIT-F global scores on guarana at days 21 (52% versus 10%) and at day 49 (66% versus 13%) as compared with patients who received placebo. After day 1: p = 0.09 After day 21: p = < 0.01 After day 49: p = < 0.01

FACIT-ES: Significantly lower expression of endocrine symptoms with guarana compared to placebo In the intragroup analysis, there were significant differences favoring guarana for the placebo–guarana arm but not for the guarana–placebo arm. After day 1: p = 0.18 After day 21: p = 0.01 After day 49: p = < 0.01

Risk of Bias Assessment: Cochrane RoB tool 2.0
Bias arising from the randomization process ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (assignment to intervention) ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (adhering to intervention) NA
Bias due to missing outcome data ?
Bias in measurement of the outcome ?
Bias in selection of the reported result ?
Other sources of bias ?
Overall RoB judgment ?

Fatigue

Outcome type As specificed by the authors Primary
Outcome specification Global Chalder Fatigue Scale: Measure of fatigue severity for both physical and mental symptoms that scored in a Likert format with response options ranging from better than usual to much worse than usual, with total possible score of 26.
Type of measurement BFI (Brief Fatigue Inventory)
Results during intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". NA
Results after intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". Global Chalder Fatigue Scale: Significant differences favoring guarana, with a drop of -4.6 points in the global score versus a significant increase of + 2.2 points for the arm receiving placebo on day 21, Difference was not significant for the intergroup analysis on day 49.

Guarana significantly improved the Global Chalder Fatigue Scale scores throughout the treatment in the placebo–guarana arm and there was a positive trend in the guarana–placebo arm (p=0.06) After day 1: p = < 0.01 After day 21: p = < 0.01 After day 49: p = 0.27

BFI: Significantly lower severity of fatigue with guarana compared to placebo. After day 1: p = NI After day 21: p = < 0.01 After day 49: p = < 0.01

Risk of Bias Assessment: Cochrane RoB tool 2.0
Bias arising from the randomization process ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (assignment to intervention) ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (adhering to intervention) NA
Bias due to missing outcome data ?
Bias in measurement of the outcome ?
Bias in selection of the reported result ?
Other sources of bias ?
Overall RoB judgment ?

Sleep

Outcome type As specificed by the authors Primary
Outcome specification Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire that inquires about frequency of sleep disturbances and subjective sleep quality
Type of measurement PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
Results during intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". NA
Results after intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". No difference between the arms.

Significantly better sleep within the guarana arm compared to baseline. Better sleep quality after the use of guarana only in the day 49 comparison and in guarana-placebo arm of the intragroup analysis Intergroup comparison of guarana and placebo: Day 21: p = .19 Day 49: p .05

Risk of Bias Assessment: Cochrane RoB tool 2.0
Bias arising from the randomization process ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (assignment to intervention) ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (adhering to intervention) NA
Bias due to missing outcome data ?
Bias in measurement of the outcome ?
Bias in selection of the reported result ?
Other sources of bias ?
Overall RoB judgment ?

Anxiety

Outcome type As specificed by the authors Primary
Outcome specification NA
Type of measurement HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Results during intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". NA
Results after intervention - Results during intervention means that the time of data collection is during or shortly after the period of the intervention (e.g. on the last day or a few days after). The results therefore still relate to the direct effects of the intervention.</br>- Results after intervention means there is a longer break between the time of data collection and the end of the intervention, e.g. more than a week. The results relate more to long-term effects.</br>- If a categorization in Results during vs. after intervention is not possible (e.g. survival data), the results are summarized under Results after intervention under the headline "Overall". No difference between the arms.
Risk of Bias Assessment: Cochrane RoB tool 2.0
Bias arising from the randomization process ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (assignment to intervention) ?
Bias due to deviation from intended intervention (adhering to intervention) NA
Bias due to missing outcome data ?
Bias in measurement of the outcome ?
Bias in selection of the reported result ?
Other sources of bias ?
Overall RoB judgment ?

Funding and Conflicts of Interest

Funding No external funding.
Conflicts of Interest No competing financial interests exist.

Further points for assessing the study

Sample

Power analysis performed ?
- Sample size corresponds to power analysis ?
- Reasons for insufficient sample size based on power analysis ?
If no power analysis performed: at least moderate sample size (n >= 30 per arm) ?
Ethnicity mentioned ?

Alternative Explanation

Other explanations for an effect besides the investigated intervention ?
- Possibility of attention effects ?
- Possibility of placebo effects ?
- Other reasons ?

Statistics

Correct use of parametric and non-parametric tests Testing for normal distribution only necessary if parametric tests are used, NI: use of parametric tests without report of normal distribution testing ?
Correction for multiple testing ?
Measurement of compliance ?
Consistent reporting in numbers (figures, flowchart, abstract, results) ?
Comprehensive and coherent reporting ?
Cross-over ?
- Sufficient washout period ?
- Tested for carry-over effects ?
- Tested for sequence effects ?

Interpretation of results

Effect sizes reported (clinical vs. statistical significance) ?
Side effects systematically recorded ?
Side effects considered in result interpretation ?
Ethics votum ?


Additional Notes