Jump to content

Example Queries

From CAMIH
Revision as of 15:24, 21 November 2024 by DDeel (talk | contribs)

What are the indications for taking selenium?

 Outcome nameResults during interventionOverall RoB judgment
Asfour et al. (2006): Effect of high-dose sodium selenite therapy on polymorphonuclear leukocyte apoptosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patientsEjection fractionAfter chemotherapy (8 days): significantly better cardiac ejection fraction in sodium selenite arm (mean(SD)= 63(6%)) vs. control arm (69(6%)); p <0.05high risk
Asfour et al. (2006): Effect of high-dose sodium selenite therapy on polymorphonuclear leukocyte apoptosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patientsToxicityAfter chemotherapy (8 days): significant less infections in sodium selenite arm (20%) compared to control arm (67%); p<0.05high risk
Büntzel et al. (2010): Limited effects of selenium in the prevention of radiation-associated toxicities - results of a randomized study in head neck cancer patientsToxicityMaximum toxicity intervention vs. control arm: dysphagia 22.7% vs. 35.3%, ageusia 22.7% vs. 47.1%, xerostomia 22.7% vs. 23.5%, and stomatitis 36.4% vs. 23.5%; no significant differences; Significant mean difference between arms only for dysphagia at week 7: mean intervention arm 1.533 vs. control 2.167 (p=0.05)some concerns
... further results

What are the side effects of cannabis?

 Side Effects / Interactions
Côté et al. (2016): Improving Quality of Life With Nabilone During Radiotherapy Treatments for Head and Neck Cancers: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled TrialNo differences for sleepiness (p=0.32), anxiety (p=0.92) and xerostomia (p=0.83)
No differences for sleepiness (p=0.32), anxiety (p=0.92) and xerostomia (p=0.83)
Fallon et al. (2017) I: Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studiesOverall 68% at least one event; assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%:

Total n=64 (32.2%), of which somnolence n=18 (9%), dizziness n=15 (7.5%), nausea n=10 (5%)


2 severe side effects associated with intervention: 1x constipation (with 360mg/day morphine equivalents), 1x moderate disorientation and somnolence on day 4 (with 2.5 daily sprays of Sativex)


None of the deaths related to intervention
Overall 64% at least one event; assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%: Total n=41 (20.7%), of which somnolence n=6 (3%), dizziness n=6 (3%), nausea n=8 (4%)


2 severe side effects associated with intervention: 1x constipation (with 360mg/day morphine equivalents), 1x moderate disorientation and somnolence on day 4 (with 2.5 daily sprays of Sativex)


None of the deaths related to intervention
Fallon et al. (2017) II: Sativex oromucosal spray as adjunctive therapy in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studiesPart A

Overall 60% at least one event, assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%: Total n=128, 31.7%, somnolence (n=42, 10.4%), nausea (n=21, 5.2%) and dizziness (n=21, 5.2%)

Part B

Overall 72% at least one event; assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%: Total n=16, 15.5%; somnolence (n=6, 5.8%)


More than twice as many patients in Sativex arm discontinued study due to side effects (n=14, 13.6% vs. n=6, 5.8%); no statistical comparison given)

None of the deaths related to intervention
Part A

Overall 60% at least one event, assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%: Total n=128, 31.7%, somnolence (n=42, 10.4%), nausea (n=21, 5.2%) and dizziness (n=21, 5.2%)


Part B

Overall 62% at least one event; assessed as probably intervention-associated with frequency ≥ 5%: Total n=12, 11.7%; somnolence n=0
Grimison et al. (2020): Oral THC:CBD cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II crossover trialModerate or severe cannabinoid-related side effects in intervention arm and placebo arm (31% vs. 7%, p=0.002):
  • Significant differences for sedation (19% vs. 4%, p=0.002) and dizziness (10% vs. 1%, p=0.03)
  • No differences for disorientation (p=0.5) and anxiety (p=1.00)
  • No cannabinoid-related serious adverse events reported


83% of the participants preferred cannabis over placebo and 15% had a preference for placebo (p<0.001)
Moderate or severe cannabinoid-related side effects in intervention arm and placebo arm (31% vs. 7%, p=0.002):

  • Significant differences for sedation (19% vs. 4%, p=0.002) and dizziness (10% vs. 1%, p=0.03)
  • No differences for disorientation (p=0.5) and anxiety (p=1.00)
  • No cannabinoid-related serious adverse events reported


83% of the participants preferred cannabis over placebo and 15% had a preference for placebo (p<0.001)
Jatoi et al. (2002): Dronabinol Versus Megestrol Acetate Versus Combination Therapy for Cancer-Associated Anorexia: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group StudyImpotence in 18 % of men; vomiting; fluid retention; confused thinking; drowsiness; loss of coordination; inappropriate behavior
Impotence in 4% of men; vomiting; fluid retention; confused thinking; drowsiness; loss of coordination; inappropriate behavior
Impotence in 14% of men; vomiting; fluid retention; confused thinking; drowsiness; loss of coordination; inappropriate behavior
Johnson et al. (2010): Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related painIntervention-associated events in n=106 (60%): drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, confusion, vomiting, hypotension, hypercalcemia, increased gamma GT


Most side effects were mild/moderate; no statistical comparisons given; one case of syncope probably related to THC; other events not associated with intervention
Intervention-associated events in n=106 (60%): drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, confusion, vomiting, hypotension, hypercalcemia, increased gamma GT;


Most side effects were mild/moderate; no statistical comparisons given; one case of syncope probably related to THC; other events not associated with intervention
NI
Lichtmann et al. (2018): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as an Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Chronic Uncontrolled PainMost frequently nausea (n=17) and dizziness (n=15); 1 case of disorientation and 1 case of visual hallucinations
Most frequently nausea (n=10) and dizziness (n=5); 1 case of vomiting
Portenoy et al. (2012): Nabiximols for Opioid-Treated Cancer Patients With Poorly-Controlled Chronic Pain: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Graded-Dose TrialCognitive functions: negative effect of nabiximols (no values given); nausea and vomiting; dizziness; drowsiness; disorientation; anorexia, constipation; dry mouth; anemia; diarrhea; dysgeusia headache; asthenia hallucinations; reduced appetite; fatigue; pain; insomnia; stomatitis; weight loss
Cognitive functions: negative effect of nabiximols (no values given); nausea and vomiting; dizziness; drowsiness; disorientation; anorexia, constipation; dry mouth; anemia; diarrhea; dysgeusia headache; asthenia hallucinations; reduced appetite; fatigue; pain; insomnia; stomatitis; weight loss
Cognitive functions: negative effect of nabiximols (no values given); nausea and vomiting; dizziness; drowsiness; disorientation; anorexia, constipation; dry mouth; anemia; diarrhea; dysgeusia headache; asthenia hallucinations; reduced appetite; fatigue; pain; insomnia; stomatitis weight loss
NI
Strasser et al. (2006): Comparison of orally administered cannabis extract and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in treating patients with cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (…)Total adverse events:
  • n=197, of which possibly intervention-associated n=45 and likely intervention-associated n=7
  • Temporary or permanent dose reduction was necessary for 30 patients
  • Adverse events that occurred more than 10 times were: Nausea/vomiting (n=21), fatigue (n=14), pain (n=17), anemia (n=14), dizziness (n=11), dyspnea (n=7), diarrhea (n=7), obstipation (n=7), vertigo (n not reported); no differences in frequencies between arm
  • Of all side effects n=101 were mild, n=71 moderate, n=24 severe (mainly dizziness, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea)
  • 33 very severe side effects such as dyspnoea, tumor progression, vomiting, deterioration of general well-being, death, pain, fever, diarrhoea, exsiccation; 6 of which were life-threatening, 27 required hospitalization
    Total adverse events:
  • n=238, of which possibly intervention-associated n=28 and likely intervention-associated n=9
  • Temporary or permanent dose reduction was necessary for 34 patients
  • Adverse events that occurred more than 10 times were: Nausea/vomiting (n=23), fatigue (n=16), pain (n=11), anemia (n=9), dizziness (n=9), dyspnea (n=9), diarrhea (n=6), obstipation (n=6), vertigo (n not reported); no differences in frequencies between arms
  • Of all side effects n=104 were mild, n=113 moderate, n=21 severe (mainly dizziness, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea)
  • 32 very severe side effects such as dyspnoea, tumor progression, vomiting, deterioration of general well-being, death, pain, fever, diarrhoea, exsiccation; 6 of which were life-threatening, 25 required hospitalization
    Total adverse events:
  • n=91, of which possibly intervention-associated n=17 and likely intervention-associated n=4
  • Temporary or permanent dose reduction was necessary for 14 patients
  • Adverse events that occurred more than 10 times were: Nausea/vomiting (n=11), fatigue (n=4), pain (n=5), anemia (n=6), dizziness (n=7), dyspnea (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), obstipation (n=2), vertigo (n not reported); no differences in frequencies between arms
  • Of all side effects n=36 were mild, n=43 moderate, n=12 severe (mainly dizziness, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea)
  • 17 very severe side effects such as dyspnoea, tumor progression, vomiting, deterioration of general well-being, death, pain, fever, diarrhoea, exsiccation; 1 of which were life-threatening, 16 required hospitalization

Does curcumin help against nausea?

What is cannabis recommended for/against?

Does selenium help with mucositis?

 Results after interventionOverall RoB judgment
Jahangard-Rafsanjani et al. (2013): The efficacy of selenium in prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic SCT: a randomized clinical trialNA
No difference between selenium arm (26.92±6.26 days) and placebo arm (25.81±4.33 days); p=0.38
Overall: No difference between the arms; p= 0.35
No difference between the arms; p= 0.69
Overall: No difference between arms for increase in serum creatinine; p=0.31 or increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase: p=0.62
Significant difference in mean serum selenium level between two arms at 14 days after transplantation (8.34 mcg/dL in the selenium arm vs 7.36 mcg/dL in the placebo arm), p=0.018
Overall: Cumulative incidence (grade 1-4) comparable in both selenium arm (83.8%) and placebo arm (81.1%); p=0.76; grade 3-4 mucositis significantly lower in selenium arm (10.8%) compared to placebo arm (35.1%); p=0.013 (grade 4: 2x in placebo arm, 0x in selenium arm)


Mean duration comparable (p=0.048), only duration of objective mucositis from grade 2 to 4 and back was significantly shorter in the selenium arm (3.6±1.84 days) than in the placebo arm (5.3±2.2 days); p=0.014
NA
some concerns
some concerns
some concerns
some concerns
some concerns
some concerns
high risk
some concerns
Laali et al. (2020): Effect of Selenium on Incidence and Severity of Mucositis during Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck CancerAt the end of radiation (after 7 weeks) there was no difference in the mean serum selenium level between the selenium arm and placebo arm (p=0.24)

Based on the selenium level before radiation, developing severe oral mucositis was statistically significant postponed in patients who had selenium levels ≥ 65 mcg/L (p=0.04)
After 7 weeks no significant differences between the selenium arm and the placebo arm for:

  • mean duration of oral mucositis (grade 1–4) (p=0.27)
  • onset of oral mucosits (p =0.31)
  • recovery (day after radiation completion (p=0.80)
  • cumulative incidence of oral mucusitis (grade 1–4) (p=0.79)


Severe oral mucositis (grade 3 or 4) was seen in 25 patients in the selenium arm and in 20 patients in the placebo arm.


Addition: Development of oral mucositis in patients with selenium levels >65 mcg/l significantly delayed from baseline (p=0.04, no further explanation given)
NA
high risk
Mix et al. (2015): Randomized phase II trial of selenomethionine as a modulator of efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckOverall: No significant differences between arms (grade 3 intervention arm 2x, placebo arm 3x, no grade 4)
Only one patient from the intervention arm did not reach CR and died
After 12 months: No significant differences between arms
After 12 months: No significant differences between arms
No significant difference for week 6-8 post-treatment and Follow-up within a year
Overall:
  • Hearing dysfunction n=1 each in the intervention arm and placebo arm;
  • elevated creatinine n=1 in the placebo arm;
  • myelosuppression: anemia in the placebo arm n=1;
  • leukopenia in the intervention arm n=3 and placebo arm n=2;
  • dermatitis in the intervention arm n=2;
  • dry mouth in the placebo arm n=2;
  • dysgeusia in the intervention arm n=2, placebo arm n=1;
  • odyno-/dysphagia in the intervention arm n=1, placebo arm n=2;
  • oral/throat pain in the placebo arm n=2;
  • mucus/sputum intervention arm n=3, placebo arm n=1
some concerns
low risk
low risk
low risk
some concerns
some concerns

What is the optimal dosage of cannabis for the treatment of nausea?

 Outcome nameDosage and regime
Côté et al. (2016): Improving Quality of Life With Nabilone During Radiotherapy Treatments for Head and Neck Cancers: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled TrialPain
Weight
Appetite
Nausea
Unspecified effects
Toxicity
Quality of life
0.5 mg nabilone tablets (from Valeant Canada)
  • once a day before radiotherapy in the first week
  • twice a day in the second week
  • third week until end of radiotherapy: adjusted by radiation oncologist up to maximal 4 tablets
    Placebo tablets
  • once a day before radiotherapy in the first week
  • twice a day in the second week
  • third week until end of radiotherapy: adjusted by radiation oncologist up to maximal 4 tablets
Johnson et al. (2010): Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related painPain
Pain
Sleep
Nausea
Cognitive functioning
Cognitive functioning
Appetite
Quality of life
Pain
THC:CBD via oral spray (self-applied by patient, one dose 2.7mg THC and 2.5mg CBD)

Week 1: dose finding

Week 2: stable dose, maximum of 8 sprays every 3 hours and 48 sprays in 24 hours: dose was determined by patients themselves
THC extract via oral spray (2.7 mg), dosage variable; Week 1: dose finding

Week 2: stable dose, maximum of 8 sprays every 3 hours and 48 sprays in 24 hours: dose was determined by patients themselves
NI
Strasser et al. (2006): Comparison of orally administered cannabis extract and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in treating patients with cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (…)Appetite
Quality of life
Mood/Affect
Nausea
Anorexia/Cachexia
Toxicity
Functionality
Weight
2.5mg THC orally, 2x a day, preferably taken before lunch and dinner/at bedtime
2,5mg THC + 1mg cannabidiol, 2x a day, preferably taken before lunch and dinner/at bedtime
2x a day, preferably taken before lunch and dinner/at bedtime