Jump to content

Property:Results during intervention

From CAMIH

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 20 pages using this property.
F
G
Post‐treatment serum zinc levels were signifiicantly lower in the control group than in the treatment group (p = 0.05)  +
No statistical relationship between the administration of zinc and esophagitis (p = 0.596); incidence of esophagitis was lower in the patients with normal serum zinc levels before and after RT, but that was not statistically signifiicant (p = 0.351)  +
Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 mucositis were observed in 37.5%, 32.5%, 27.5%, and 2.5% of the patients; Grade 4 mucositis was not noted in any of the patients; there was no relationship between zinc replacement and mucositis (p = 0.159); incidence of mucositis was lower in the patients with normal serum zinc levels before and after RT, though that was not statistically signifiicant (p = 0.476)  +
Results after 2 cycles, after switching to the other arm: * Advantage for intervention arm for percentage for CR (p=0.04), for scales "no vomiting" (p=0.05), "no emergency medication" p=0.04), "no significant nausea" (p=0.03), mean and maximum number of vomiting per day (p=0.003, p=0.001), mean/maximum nausea values (p's<0.001). * No difference for complete response and "no significant nausea" (p=0.12)  +
Moderate or severe cannabinoid-related side effects in intervention arm (31%) and placebo arm (7%) (p=0.002): * Significant differences for sedation (19% vs. 4%, p=0.002), dizziness (10% vs. 1%, p=0.03) * No differences for disorientation (3% vs. 0%, p=0.5), anxiety (1% vs. 1%, p=1.00) * No cannabinoid-related serious adverse events were reported. 83% of the participants preferred cannabis over placebo and 15% had a preference for placebo (p<0.001).  +
FLIE: * significant advantage for intervention arm for nausea scale (mean difference: 20.9 on 100-point scale, p < 0.001) and vomiting scale (mean difference: 11.9, p < 0.001) AQOL-8D: * significant advantage for intervention arm in use-related QoL (mean difference: 0.04, 95% CI 0.01,0.07; p=0.019) * physical health (mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.09, p < 0.001) * mental health (mean difference: 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.06, p=0.004) * pain (mean difference: 0.08, 95% CI 0.03, 0.13, p=0.003)  +
Results after 2 cycles, after switching to the other arm: * Significant advantage for intervention arm (25%) compared to placebo arm (14%): RR=1.77; 90% CI=1.12,2.79; p=0.041.  +